Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Interview With The Author Of Hank Greenberg: The Hero of Heroes


Interview With Sports Author John Rosengren



1.      Why did you choose to write about Hank Greenberg? I did an article for the Baseball Hall of Fame's magazine Memories & Dreams about Greenberg's dramatic comeback in 1945, when he was the first star to return from military service and all eyes were on him to see if players could do it.  While researching that article, I realized there was a lot more to Greenberg's story and that there had not been a biography written about him.  So I set out to tell what I thought was a significant story, not just about a baseball player but about a man who became a hero to his generation.

2.      Was he an inspiration to Jews the way Jackie Robinson was for African Americans? Greenberg stood 6'4" and weighed 220 pounds.  While that might not be considered big by today's standards, it was huge in the '30s when the average ballplayer was only 5'11".  He towered over contemporaries like Lou Gehrig.  Being big and a home run hitter, Greenberg shattered the prevalent stereotype that Jews were weak and unathletic.  At a time when Jews were being persecuted abroad and at home, he became a symbol of hope.  " When you’re running around the jungle of the ghetto on the Lower East Side, you couldn’t help but be exhilarated by the sight of one of our guys looking like a Colossus,” Matthau said. “He eliminated for me all those jokes which start out: ‘Did you hear the one about the little Jewish gentleman?’”    

As an aside, Greenberg was also instrumental in supporting Robinson during a critical time of his rookie year.  In May, the Dodgers came to Pittsburgh, where Greenberg played his final season in 1947.  Robinson had just gone public about the death threats he had received, then had Phillies players point bats like rifles at him.  Greenberg and Robinson had a collision at first base that could have sparked a race riot, but instead Greenberg asked Jackie if he was okay and gave him some words of encouragement.  Afterward Robinson said, "Class tells.  It sticks out all over Mr. Greenberg."

3.      What did you find rewarding - -and challenging -- about writing your book?The biggest challenge was when I realized that the Yale Press had scheduled a biography of Greenberg for publication prior to mine.  That pushed me to work harder on mine so it was better.  I plumbed resources previously unexplored like county court divorce records, Greenberg's military file and MLB daily batting logs to unearth new information.  The reward was finding details that allowed me to shed new light on his story and/or to clear up misconceptions that had been previously published.  His own son was surprised by one fact I unearthed about the widely told anecdote that the Detroit Free Press published a headline that said Happy New Year in Hebrew.  I was able to set the record straight that the headline appeared on the first day of Rosh Hashanah, not after Greenberg hit two home runs that day as he used to tell people.

4.      Baseball has changed immensely from when Hank played the game, but what still remains the same about the game? The game remains a treasure trove of history and lore passed from one generation to the next, but when Greenberg played it was truly the national pastime.  The NFL and NBA did not exist.  Baseball was the breeding ground for heroes and it alone held center stage in the media.  On that stage, Greenberg became the most popular athlete of his generation in the spring 1941--more popular than Joe DiMaggio, Ted Williams or Bob Feller--when he was the reigning AL MVP and drafted into the Army.

5.      Why do so many readers enjoy a good biography, even about historical figures that have had books written about them previously? I think we enjoy biographies because we're drawn to the stories of others who can inspire us.  They let us realize our possibilities as humans, what good--and, in some cases, evil--we're capable of.  Greenberg does not disappoint in this regard. He teaches us about courage, integrity and dignity.

For more information, please consult: www.hankgreenberg.net


Do Great Writers Have To Possess Many Of the Following 28 Traits? Or Do Only Addicts, Crazies, Victims and Celebrities Make Best-Seller Lists?

Brian Feinblum’s views, opinions, and ideas expressed in this blog are his alone and not that of his employer, the nation’s largest book promoter. You can follow him on Twitter @theprexpert and email him at brianfeinblum@gmail.com. He feels more important when discussed in the third-person. This blog is copyrighted material by BookMarketingBuzzBlog 2013 ©

Monday, February 4, 2013

Are You Destined To Write Great Books?


In the past few weeks we have seen stories about athletes using steroids or illegal substances to gain an edge in their performance. Actors admit to taking HGH or getting plastic surgery to fit into certain movie roles. And no doubt, some high-pressure jobs are filled with people who rely on alcohol or some other toxin to get them through the day and night. So what about writers? What do they call upon to give them an edge, to make them feel infused with genius?

I came up with a list of no less than 28 major factors or influencers that dictate a writer’s likely level of success. But like with all formulas, there are exceptions. You cannot build writers like a building, but you can see what types of things influence their structure. Here is what I think shapes writers:

1.                  Genetics
2.                  Childhood
3.                  Education
4.                  Specialized training
5.                  Faith and religion
6.                  Mental wellness
7.                  State of health
8.                  Wealth class
9.                  Neighborhood environment
10.              The era or times you live in
11.              Age
12.              Experiences
13.              Physical size
14.              Looks
15.              Race
16.              Sex
17.              Sexual preference
18.              Time available to write
19.              Your circumstances
20.              Frame of mind
21.              Geographic location
22.              Access to certain people or information
23.              What has been published and what you read of it
24.              Music, films, theater, games, and other media
25.              Access to help, such as a paid editor
26.              A motivational or inspirational person in your life – lover, parent, child, friend, clergy
27.              Robotics and technology
28.              Desires and emotions

Many writers who succeed commercially are often broken. We learn they are depressed, substance abusers, loners, suicidal, victims of a crime, raised in poverty, etc. Many write from anger, fear, loss, conviction, and an unquenchable emptiness. They write to create a world that takes them out of the one they are in. The written word is all that stands between them and a casket.

The writer bares a great burden. He or she feels and thinks deeply about life and sometimes the world is too heavy to lift on one’s shoulders. All too often writers find the therapeutic outlet provided by writing is best enhanced by something else. They turn to addictive substances – alcohol, drugs, pain killers, pharmaceuticals or addictive behaviors – binge eating, gambling, pr relationship cheating.

Many writers are muted degrees of damaged souls. There is no cure. One must live with the illness of life. To live is to accept a certain amount of pain, disappointment, anger and frustration – but it can be tempered with laughter, love, sex, entertainment, family, friends, and beauty. Life is best lived when we escape to our writing and attempt to create a better world or at least a better moment.

But great writers do not have to be negative or crazy, or womanizing dopers. Nor do they have to be the children of dysfunctional families. Nor did they have to suffer a tremendous loss. There are all types of writers that do not explore the darkness of life and they can create great books.

I think it is harder for a writer to write beyond who they are or of what they know. A privileged childhood may make it harder for one to write on the theme of poverty, but nothing excludes him from writing about things he may know little about – power, privilege, and the presumed benefits of wealth - -travel, big houses, and instant access to legal or illegal pleasures. Can a white guy write about racism as well as an African American? Of course, but not likely. Could a farmer in Mississippi write a NYC crime thriller as well as a former cop from the Big Apple? Possibly, but not likely.

Some people are just better positioned to write what they write but there are so many intangibles that no circumstance or situation by itself guarantees great writers or best-selling books. Don’t assume your crappy life is a guaranteed pay-off. Don’t feel dissuaded from writing a great book just because something terrible or eventful has not happened to you. Just keep accumulating life experiences or interview others about theirs. Your words will come naturally and flow through you the way blood, water, and oxygen just naturally pump through your body.

I think great writing, whatever its influences, comes naturally and as a result of something or someone. We don’t create from nothing or a vacuum. Life touches us or fails us or loves us – and our writing reflects this.

I did forget one last factor that perhaps is the most important. It is one’s capacity to love and to dream that perhaps drives a writer’s story the most. To imagine different worlds, alternative realities, paths not chosen, cities not yet built, unexplored theories and unspoken conversations makes any writer armed with the great differentiator. No matter how great or shitty life has been to you, your ability to embrace it or counter it shall infuse your writings in a boundless way.

Great writers mutate beyond their lives. We don’t have to write as the sum of who we have been thus far, however great the influence our existence provides us. We write, thus we live. Or do you live, thus you write?

Brian Feinblum’s views, opinions, and ideas expressed in this blog are his alone and not that of his employer, the nation’s largest book promoter. You can follow him on Twitter @theprexpert and email him at brianfeinblum@gmail.com. He feels more important when discussed in the third-person. This is copyrighted by BookMarketingBuzzBlog 2013 ©

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Time To Salute Sylvester Stallone


Who would have thought that an actor could still be a leading man after making scores of films over a four-decade acting career that began with a soft-core porn film?

I am talking about Sylvester Stallone.  Sly debuted on screen in 1970 with The Party at Kitty and Stud’s. The IMDB plot summary says: “Kitty and Stud are lovers. They enjoy a robust sex life, which includes fellatio and light S & M, specifically, Stud belt-whipping Kitty. Three women come over for a party and Stud services them, one after the other.”

Stallone is best known for creating two more franchises that collectively have grossed billions of box office dollars. He made a hero of the underdog with a will to fight against the odds. Rocky and Rambo total 10 films. He has made dozens of others – some memorable, like Lords of Flatbush, Nighthawks, Cliffhanger, Judge Dress, and Cop Land, and others not so special, like Tango & Cash.

He has a cinematic mystique about him that cannot be explained so easily. In fact, he is an enigma. He has made perhaps more bad movies than good ones. He is loved by loyal fans and multiple generations in many nations. He acts, writes, and directs. But he does not seem to get the critical acclaim. He has never won an Oscar for best actor, and is rarely nominated. When you think of great actors he does not come to mind, yet he has such a screen presence about him.

He is an impact actor. The muscles, the voice, those puppy dog eyes, his ability to play the unexpected or unlikely hero, his knack to take a punch and come back to deliver punishment, and his morality-driven characters add up to why I cannot deny my bromance with the Hollywood hunk.

He still makes action films as a senior citizen. He may be aided by HGH and other drugs, surgeries, and makeup, but there is still a raw, unsmoothed but perfectly carved actor’s soul inside his superhero body.

Of the active and still popular  -- if not great actors – dating from the 1970s to the present – DeNiro, Pacino, Eastwood, Allen – Stallone doesn’t seem to compare. They are true actors and geniuses. But Stallone, I don’t know how you quantify him, but he has that special quality that is undeniable and irresistible.

We lobe how he gives off a primordial, gut-deep scream as he lashes back at his tormentor. We love that he gets up from devastation and sets things right with a combination of powerful punches. We like his speech impediment and how he snarls words through his teeth and how his upper lip is permanently curled to give an image of rage and contempt. His facial contortions breathe fire and passion. He is moving energy even when he stands still.

He is someone you could root for, but many do so with a sense of guilt or embarrassment. I say you should not be afraid to admit your Stallone lovefest. Suspend your beliefs or sense of reality and just let yourself take in this legend on his terms.

As a final note, I saw his new movie, Bullet to the Head. It is a C+, in part because the dialogue was poor and his co-star lacked acting talent. But still, even when playing a hit man, Stallone finds a way to root for him. He gets you to appreciate his trademark things about all of his movie characters – being a loner, defeating a bigger enemy, and unleashing a contained rage. There is something damaged, yet bold, about him.

Is Stallone a paycheck hack, a steroid-doper, an illiterate who glorifies onscreen violence? Yes, but boy he does what he does better than most and is a unique brand that, like a car wreck, I just cannot take my eyes off.

I love, Mr. Stallone.


SUPER DUD TO STUD


The lights went out early in the third quarter of the Super Bowl. It seemed like they should have stayed off. The game was a clunker. Not even the advertisements, which lacked invention for the most part ( but I loved the car commercial that celebrated farmers, the Doritos goat, and Samsung's LeBron James cameo), could save it. Beyonce's halftime show was excellent, however. Super Bowl 47 was not going down in history as a winner, and in fact, it looked like it would rank in the bottom half historically. The game was a 22-point blowout, being won easily by the underdog Baltimore Ravens. It looked like the game would cap an NFL season of few surprises or drama. But the power came back and it surged through the San Francisco 49ers. They roared back to within two points by mid fourth quarter and looked poise to make one of the biggest sporting comebacks in championship history. All of a sudden the game was looking like one of the all-time classics. CBS must have been ecstatic, seeing a bust turn to gold. As Baltimore extended its now tiny lead to five with 4:18 left in the game, the stage was set for more drama. SF marched down field in just a few minutes, and looked ready to score on a top-notch defense, to take the lead for the first time in the game. But it was not to be. SF failed to score within the 10-yard line on three attempts and the game ended with the Ravens desperately outlasting their competition. What a game!

Brian Feinblum’s views, opinions, and ideas expressed in this blog are his alone and not that of his employer, the nation’s largest book promoter. You can follow him on Twitter @theprexpert and email him at brianfeinblum@gmail.com. He feels more important when discussed in the third-person. This is copyrighted by BookMarketingBuzzBlog 2013 ©

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Nation Mourns A Great Mayor


What Died With Mayor Ed KochKoch


Anyone who wants to understand – for better or worse – what it means to be a New Yorker – need look no further than the life and times of New York City’s irascible three-term mayor, Edward I. Koch. The beloved hero of the nation’s largest city died in the early morning of February 1, a day that was supposed to celebrate the launch of a move about his career in politics. It was also a day Grand Central Station, the world’s largest train terminal, celebrated its centennial.

Koch was the quintessential New Yawka, a legendary figure in the late 1970s and throughout the 80s. At the time of his dozen-year run I grew up from a 10-year-old boy to a college graduate. I was inspired by his colorful ways, his biting humor and cutting wit, and his ability to both tell it like he sees it but to keep things positive. Some found him antagonistic, which at times he was, but there was never a dull moment with him.

To be honest, Koch did not accomplish as much as some mayors. In fact,  crime, which had been out of control prior to him taking office on January 1, 1978, got dramatically worse during the drug wars over coke and crack. The AIDS epidemic s engulfed the nation and hit the city hard. Homelessness was also out of control.  And when he left office on December 31, 1989 – denied a fourth term due to racial divisiveness and City Hall corruption – it seemed like he had run his course.

But Koch was a great cheerleader and did a few things exceptionally well. First and foremost, he bought fiscal sanity back to a city that was on the verge of bankruptcy. He saved the city and brought back a standard of excellence and prominence to the Big Apple. Second, he gave the city an immense image boost with his in-your-face speeches, confrontational press conferences, and exchange of barbs with buffoons like Rev Al “Fraud” Sharpton, developer Donald “Bad Hair” Trump, and striking transit workers. He had chutzpah and became an off-Broadway attraction as the ambassador for a city that drowned in crime, graffiti, and red ink.

Mr. Koch, you loveable schmuck, may you rest in peace.

Brian Feinblum’s views, opinions, and ideas expressed in this blog are his alone and not that of his employer, the nation’s largest book promoter. You can follow him on Twitter @theprexpert and email him at brianfeinblum@gmail.com. He feels more important when discussed in the third-person. This is copyrighted by BookMarketingBuzzBlog 2013 ©

Friday, February 1, 2013

Connected – But Disconnected



As a parent of two young children I can attest that we are losing the war -- not on drugs, violence, or debt – but on technology. Kids today are normalizing their world with gadgets filling up their minds. Their view of the world is seen through screens – smartphones, tablets, computers, video games and television. If they are not on one, they are on another. To multitask for them is to have multiple screens going simultaneously.

They fill empty time with gadgets, rather than use it to dream, think, talk, play, write, draw, or do something other than flick a finger or press a button.

Sure you can blame the parents – they control what their children do. Or do they?

Play dates, school, babysitters, and other time beyond my purview means my kids could be pressing buttons all over the place.

But even when they are right in front of me or in the car, I see them watching videos and shows or downloading music and apps. They read books too – and play non-electronic games and socialize – so I don’t think they are complete vegetables. But I sense that the tech world is luring them into a virtual world that often overshadows the real one.

What is the solution?

It is up to each of us to show and state why real-life activities, human interactions face-to-face, and non-screen time is important, fun, and necessary. If that does not work I suppose I could make a video about this and email it to my kids.

Brian Feinblum’s views, opinions, and ideas expressed in this blog are his alone and not that of his employer, the nation’s largest book promoter. You can follow him on Twitter @theprexpert and email him at brianfeinblum@gmail.com. He feels more important when discussed in the third-person. This blog is copyrighted material by BookMarketingBuzzBlog 2013 ©

Interview With A Genocide Survivor



Interview With The Author Of: Bamboo Promise: Prison Without Walls, Vicheara Houn


1.       Vicheara, what inspired you to write your book? One day, more than ten years after settling in America and struggling every day to begin a new life, I sat alone by a window watching a beautiful little bird pick up a tiny twig in his beak and fly away. I wondered how far that bird had to fly with those twigs, one by one, to make a nest. How remarkable that this bird would be so devoted to his family. The miracle of family, family devotion and sacrifice was symbolized to me by that little bird and his labors.

Although I had lived many years with painful memories, I was suddenly overwhelmed with grief for the loss of my father in the Cambodian genocide.. Though he had died years before, I felt his spirit still around me. I longed to tell him once more that I loved him and honored him. I wanted him to know how much I missed him. I cried aloud for him and asked God why I was left alone without him.
This book began as a letter to my father asking for the answers to the many problems in my life. I wanted to tell him I had tried many ways to keep myself as strong as he wanted me to be, but now I had become physically and emotionally exhausted. I needed new hope.

My letter began as just a few little scratches. Then, as I wrote, many memories – so long suppressed – returned. My scratches became forty pages, then one hundred, then more and more. My letter to Papa had become “Bamboo Promise”, the story of my life and my journey through the Cambodian genocide and its aftermath. Writing it has helped me to restore my soul.

2.      What exactly happened to you? A: I was raised as the sheltered and privileged only child of a prominent Cambodian family. I had little knowledge of hardships endured by my country’s poor or the dangerous political movements afoot in the Cambodia of my youth.

When I was a young bride, the political tensions in Cambodia were reaching a breaking point. My father, who had risen through the government ranks to the position of a senior diplomat, was in the forefront of negotiations with the communist insurgents.  All our family trusted his political knowledge but this trust was a naïve and terrible mistake. When the KR took over the city and we joined the mass of humanity being expelled to the countryside, it became very apparent that my father never really understood the Khmer Rouge or what Pol Pot had planned for Cambodia as the monstrous KR leader tried to turn back time and return Cambodia to the Year Zero.

In April 17, 1975 at 7 AM, a day after Cambodian New Year, Phnom Penh fell to the Communists and within 24 hours the entire population of the capitol was forced to leave the city with no destination, no future, no hope. Those who survived the forced expulsion were murdered or spent the next years as slave laborers, slowly starving to death or dying of disease. Nearly two million perished, including everyone in my immediate family.  I alone survived.

Pol Pot transformed Cambodia, the country of his birth, into a Prison Without Walls. This extreme form of radical communism eliminated religion, culture, currency, personal property, hospitals, schools, the banking system, and every other vestige of modern urban life. Pol Pot’s followers were radical anti-intellectuals who believed that only agricultural labor deserved respect. They committed class genocide against Cambodian’s educated urban citizens through starvation, execution, and forced labor.

I lost my parents, grandparents, my grandaunt, uncle, servant and her child. My young husband was murdered without ever having a chance to say good bye.  Many, many other extended family members also lost their lives.

I emerged from the genocide as an orphan with no belongings, no support and only my determination to honor my promises to my father. I rebuilt myself in a war ravaged country. Struggling with the ideals of a traditional Cambodian woman’s role in a broken society, I began to develop my own identity. I informed myself through education and experience.  I eventually made the heartbreaking decision to leave my homeland and seek a new life. I escaped over the rugged, dangerous mountains to a refugee camp in Thailand. 

3.      What did you witness?  I watched my young husband led to his death.  I watched every member of my immediate family starve to death. I watched my neighbors turn on their parents and children for a can of rice.  I saw my fellow workers beaten and abused.   I saw those around me suffer and die from malaria even as I was helpless with malarial fever and delirium. They died usually in the morning.

I saw bodies floating by in the river and abandoned along the roadside. They had been eviscerated and their stomachs filled with grass.

I was abused by child soldiers, as young as ten.  They had been taught that city people were allied with Americans who had killed their families and friends through bombing raids. They told us that we had been poisoned by western society and were so worthless that they would kill us with an axe on the back of our neck without wasting any bullets. I remember their most common insult: “Keeping you won’t benefit us; destroying you won’t cost us anything”. The KR  brainwashed these young kids to reject their family and believe that they were children of the KR organization called Angkar. They trained the kids to spy on their own parents and report to Angkar if they believed their parents violated Angkar’s rules.  Sound familiar?  Just like the Hitler Youth in Nazi Germany.

The Khmer Rouge regime separated us, the urbanites, from the peasants and farmers. There was no equality in work assignments or in food rations. We were called “New people” or “Refugees” or “People of April 17th” and the rural people were the “Old People”. Old people had power over us, the new people. They monitored our work and spied on us. They ate full meals with meat and dessert. They used bamboo sticks to force us to work harder and beat us if they felt we were unproductive. 
I watched as the Khmer Rouge first murdered us  - the city dwellers.  Later, as their organization began to crumble from within, they slaughtered their own.  At first only the refugees were starved but soon the villagers who had supported the KR also starved as all the rice went to China to repay war debts.

The KR had a code of for murder – “re-education”. People became aware of this meaning when their family and friends were sent to be re-educated and were never heard from again. My husband disappeared from my sight for this reason. He was accused of having a military background, when he did not. This was just an excuse to murder people. Sociopaths and psychopaths had free reign over helpless victims and tortured them mercilessly.

In 1979, when we were all liberated from the killing fields, we were subjugated to a new phase of communism under the Vietnamese. I was obligated to attend three months of re-education before I could work in the new society. Their method was not terror but coercion and deceit. We were told to tell the uneducated Khmer peasant survivors that the Vietnamese were our saviors and we had to pay respect to them. Learning the Vietnamese language was mandatory in my University pharmacy program.  Western people have very little knowledge of the abuses of the Vietnamese Communists in Cambodia.  Hun Sen is their puppet.

4.      What are you hoping the reader will take away from your story? A: My hope is that young Cambodians and Cambodians in the diaspora will read this, and more erudite texts, to learn more about what happened to their country and its people. I hope all who read will understand how a radical, violent political movement bent on death and destruction, was able to consume nearly two million innocent souls, while the world stood by. It is only when you know why something has happened that you can prevent its re-occurrence.

It is important that the world learns how Cambodians, my family and I included, lived and died through four years of Hell on earth. Nearly two million Cambodians were executed, starved, and tortured to death. All who survived, both victims and victimizers, have been traumatized and permanently scarred.

I also hope that, in some small way, my book will help Cambodians remember the history of their country and not let history repeat itself. I hope it will make young Cambodians more sensitive to the trauma that their parents and grandparents endured.

Also, my book shows how naïve many of the most privileged were to believe that nothing so horrible could happen to our country. My father, who had promised me that nothing would happen to us or to Cambodia, is my best example of this blindness. In our case, genocide was the price we paid for ignoring the signs, and assuming that something cannot happen simply because you can’t imagine it.
The weaknesses in Cambodian society, in particular our sometimes blind and unquestioning obedience to our leaders; our failure to educate all our citizens; and our acceptance of a society based upon class distinctions rather than the value of all people, paved the road for Pol Pot and his angry and vengeful followers. Our neighboring countries and the rest of the world allowed it to happen for a variety of reasons – primarily, of course, self-interest. 

5.      How can we prevent or stop genocide from happening elsewhere?  Genocide can target any group that a leader can identify as different and dangerous. Hitler singled out the Jews as scapegoats. Pol Pot made educated and “westernized” people the enemy.  Genocide is a tool practiced by a leader to satisfy his need for power and his own self-interest.  It appeals to fear and self interest in the followers.

I can understand that the human mind is very sensitive and easy to manipulate.   

The strategy for the Cambodian genocide was to convince the poor and ignorant that the well-off people in the cities had adopted corrupt western values and had supported a government (Lon Nol’s) that had caused great harm to the poor. This created feelings of hate, a desire for revenge and a sense that the corrupt city people were a danger to them. It is very important to know that the KR leaders had the support of King Sihanook who had been deposed by the Lon Nol government and the King wanted to regain his power at any cost.  The “Old People” revered the King and many KR followers believed they were fighting for him – not for communism.

It was not only the poor and ignorant who joined the KR. To the educated, the Khmer Rouge promised power in the new society and protection for themselves and their families when the KR took power. The “join me now or never” threat was effective.

Then there is another huge question:  why did the rest of the world turn a blind eye to genocide in Cambodia?  When the United States abandoned the war in   Vietnam, an unintended consequence was that Cambodia was left to the mercy of the radical communists.  The American people, weary of war and having suffered the loss of tens of thousands of soldiers, may not have realized what would happen to Cambodia, but the politicians in Washington and the leaders in the United Nations surely did.  As a consequence, Cambodians lived in the darkness of Hell for almost four years.  Where was the world?  Where was the outrage?  Why didn’t the United Nations do something?

Genocide is still occurring in the world today and will continue as long as it is allowed by the family of nations.  The United Nations was created to prevent such horror but has never been strong enough.  The UN needs to have a policy of immediate action when genocide is reported.  Leaders must understand that swift action will be taken to protect victims.  The western powers must assume leadership in this basic protection of human rights.  In the modern era of instant worldwide communication, there is no excuse for not knowing genocide is happening.

Prevention will require a different tactic.  It requires that we instill a value for human life in all societies around the globe. There is an old Cambodian proverb that says to bend the bamboo when it is young.  That means that the way to create the kind of human behavior that you want is to instill the proper values in the young. Compassion, morality, love and respect for all life are the values that can change the world. All the efforts of the United Nations should promote these values.

Schools and colleges around the globe should be encouraged to support genocide studies – including hearing from survivors whose personal experiences create reality from theory. Genocide books should be collected from all countries and be translated and available in libraries.

The genocide in Cambodia was auto-genocide in which the leader killed his own people and devastated his own country, just like what is happening in Syria today. World leaders must come together to stop this. Individual citizens must call upon their leaders to stop this.

6.      Too often rape is used as a tool to instill fear and repression . Why do men see sex as a weapon?
Rape is a devastating act of domination and power.  Its consequences are emotional, physical, psychological and long lasting.  It disrupts society at its most basic level – the family.  That makes it a very powerful weapon.

The individual rapist needs to assert his power over a female because of his own inadequacies – however they came about. 

The use of rape as a tool of war leaves behind not just a defeated population but a shattered one.  It is immensely powerful to savage, debase, humiliate and impregnate women and girls.  It is immensely powerful to demonstrate to men that they cannot protect their families.  Destroying the enemy’s family structure and stability - the very source of their strength – works.  That’s why rape is an effective tool.

The evil genius of terrorists is to strike the innocents.  Manuals on terrorism encourage attacks on schools, for example.  Terror is a powerful weapon. Terrorist leaders understand this well and use it to increase their power. 

We should treat rape the same as genocide for it is genocide of the spirit.  Rape violates not just the woman but all who love her.  The physical damage may heal but the emotional damage remains for life.  It is one of the vilest abuses of power.

For more information, please consult: http://boramtz.wix.com/bamboo-promise

HOW TO FIX AMAZON REVIEW SYSTEM

by Warren Adler
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/warren-adler/amazon-review-system_b_2527176.html


Brian Feinblum’s views, opinions, and ideas expressed in this blog are his alone and not that of his employer, the nation’s largest book promoter. You can follow him on Twitter @theprexpert and email him at brianfeinblum@gmail.com. He feels more important when discussed in the third-person. This blog is copyrighted material by BookMarketingBuzzBlog 2013 ©